This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] testsuite/gdb.c++/cplusfuncs.{exp,cc}: work with either g++ demangler
- To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: [RFA] testsuite/gdb.c++/cplusfuncs.{exp,cc}: work with either g++ demangler
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 19:43:07 -0800
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <200102051905.LAA32545@bosch.cygnus.com>
Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
>
> After my patch, gdb.c++/cplusfuncs.exp contains the lines:
>
> # gdb-gnats bug gdb/19:
> # "gdb v3 demangler fails on hairyfunc5 hairyfunc6 hairyfunc7"
> print_addr_2 "hairyfunc5" "hairyfunc5(int (*(*)($dm_type_char_star))(long))"
> print_addr_2 "hairyfunc6" "hairyfunc6(int (*(*)($dm_type_int_star))(long))"
> print_addr_2 "hairyfunc7" "hairyfunc7(int (*(*)(int (*)(char *)))(long))"
>
> The ChangeLog entry says that I added this note to gdb.c++/cplusfuncs.exp.
> In the ChangeLog I could say: "added note that ..." because of the ambiguity
> in saying "note that".
Ah, I did a mindless search for the comment but didn't see it. Ok then
:-)
Andrew