Re: [RFA] spelling corrections

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>]

yes.

Nicholas Duffek wrote:
> 
> This patch fixes a couple of miscellaneous spelling errors.
> 
> ChangeLog:
> 
>         * blockframe.c (generic_get_saved_register): Spelling fix.
>         * frame.h (FRAME_FP): Spelling fix.
> 
> Okay to apply?
> 
> Nicholas Duffek
> <nsd@redhat.com>
> 
> [patch follows]
> 
> Index: gdb/blockframe.c
> ===================================================================
> diff -up gdb/blockframe.c gdb/blockframe.c
> --- gdb/blockframe.c    Tue Dec 19 11:05:37 2000
> +++ gdb/blockframe.c    Tue Dec 19 11:05:09 2000
> @@ -1249,7 +1249,7 @@ generic_fix_call_dummy (char *dummy, COR
>     calculated rather than fetched).  We will use not_lval for values
>     fetched from generic dummy frames.
> 
> -   Set *ADDRP to the address, either in memory on as a REGISTER_BYTE
> +   Set *ADDRP to the address, either in memory or as a REGISTER_BYTE
>     offset into the registers array.  If the value is stored in a dummy
>     frame, set *ADDRP to zero.
> 
> Index: gdb/frame.h
> ===================================================================
> diff -up gdb/frame.h gdb/frame.h
> --- gdb/frame.h Tue Dec 19 11:05:43 2000
> +++ gdb/frame.h Tue Dec 19 11:05:09 2000
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ enum print_what
>  extern void *frame_obstack_alloc (unsigned long size);
>  extern void frame_saved_regs_zalloc (struct frame_info *);
> 
> -/* Return the frame address from FR.  Except in the machine-dependent
> +/* Return the frame address from FI.  Except in the machine-dependent
>     *FRAME* macros, a frame address has no defined meaning other than
>     as a magic cookie which identifies a frame over calls to the
>     inferior.  The only known exception is inferior.h