This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Linux sigtramp detection code moved to its proper place


   Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2000 17:27:44 -0500 (EST)
   From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@delorie.com>

   > *** gdb/Makefile.in	2000/03/16 10:23:38	1.13
   > --- gdb/Makefile.in	2000/03/17 19:59:40
   > ***************
   > *** 1063,1068 ****
   > --- 1063,1069 ----
   >   	i386-tdep.c i386b-nat.c i386mach-nat.c i386v-nat.c i386-linux-nat.c \
   >   	i386aix-nat.c i386m3-nat.c i386v4-nat.c i386ly-tdep.c \
   >   	i387-tdep.c \
   > + 	i386-linux-tdep.c \
   >   	i960-tdep.c \
   >   	infptrace.c inftarg.c irix4-nat.c irix5-nat.c isi-xdep.c \
   >   	lynx-nat.c m3-nat.c \

   I see you already added the new file.  Sigh...  Is it possible to find
   a different name for it, one which won't clash with i386-linux-nat.c?
   How about i386linux-tdep.c, for example?

Yuck, that's ugly!

Is it really important that these Linux-specific files are correctly
extracted on MS-DOS?  I believe your argument was about buggy tar
programs floating around, but I don't think it is too much too ask
people to fix their tar before trying to build GDB.

Mark

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]