This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] GDB command-line switches and annotations docs
- To: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] GDB command-line switches and annotations docs
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at delorie dot com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 13:09:34 -0500 (EST)
- CC: gdb-patches at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Refrences: <200003101347.IAA21898@indy.delorie.com><14537.5048.99180.910863@kwikemart.cygnus.com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
Elena Zannoni writes:
> > (Are there plans to make gdbmi.texi be part of the manual as well?)
> >
>
> Eventually yes (Andrew?), right now it is not in prime time form yet. It is
> still very rough work in progress.
IMHO, it is much better to link between the two right now, and make
any necessary corrections later. As far as I could see, gdbmi.texi is
in quite a good shape, it just lacks a few menus and @node lines to
make it a valid Texinfo file. Most of the work can be done in Emacs
automatically.
The current situation, where a large part opf the package is not
documented at all, is IMHO much worse.
I can throw together a few patches as outlined above, if that would
help.
> I was planning on removing the -async option, it is now redundant.
It's much easier to remove part of the docs than to write it ;-)
Anyway, if -noasync stays, you will need some of what I wrote under
its description.
> The behavior you describe is the ultimate goal, we are only
> about 50% there.
The truth is, I still don't know enough about the event loop's
interaction with the target side to write the docs about it. But I
thought there was no better way to get attention to its being
undocumented than to throw some patches on you-all ;-). I do think
that refining the description should be the job of someone who knows
the fine details.