This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: top-level conigure.in patch


David Edelsohn wrote:
> 
>         The following patch has been applied to the top-level configure.in
> file in the GCC copy of the tree.  Given that the gdb/binutils and gcc
> trees currently are separate, I am not sure how we are trying to
> coordinate patches in shared files.
> 
> David

I don't think anyone is trying to co-ordinate things.  People are just
trying to keep them within calling distance.
BTW, is there a reason for not wanting -fPIC on AIX?

	Andrew

PS: Yes, ok with me.  Per src/MAINTAINERS send the patch once committed
to both binutils@sourceware and gdb-patches@sourceware.

> 2000-05-15  David Edelsohn  <edelsohn@gnu.org>
> 
>         * configure.in: Special case powerpc*-*-aix* target_makefile_frag.
> 
> Index: configure.in
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/egcs/configure.in,v
> retrieving revision 1.47
> diff -c -p -r1.47 configure.in
> *** configure.in        2000/04/06 06:48:16     1.47
> --- configure.in        2000/05/06 05:12:28
> *************** if [ x${shared} = xyes ]; then
> *** 1018,1023 ****
> --- 1018,1026 ----
>       i[3456]86-*)
>         target_makefile_frag="${target_makefile_frag} config/mt-x86pic"
>         ;;
> +     powerpc*-*-aix*)
> +       # We don't want -fPIC on AIX.
> +       ;;
>       powerpc*-*)
>         target_makefile_frag="${target_makefile_frag} config/mt-ppcpic"
>         ;;

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]