Re: [RFA] Don't talk about ptrace when there's none

[Chris Faylor <cgf at cygnus dot com>]

On Thu, Apr 06, 2000 at 10:19:16AM -0400, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>Ideally, HAVE_PTRACE and CANT_FORK would be enough in this case.  But
>the former doesn't seem to exist, while the latter is used
>sporadically in a couple of source files, but doesn't appear to be a
>legit global symbol that we could use.
>
>> maybe HAVE_PTRACE exists in config.h?
>
>I cannot find it there.
>
>> I ask because we don't have ptrace on BeOS either, and i don't think
>> we want to have more than one ifdef.
>
>We could have some OS-specific ifdefs at the top of infrun.c, if no
>other good options exist, but that's ugly.

Yeah.  Cygwin doesn't need this either, FWIW.

Isn't there a define that is specific to ptrace somewhere that we could
use to control the definition of a HAVE_PTRACE?  Or, alternatively, couldn't
we just add HAVE_PTRACE to the appropriate target headers?

cgf