This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: source listing change

To: Fernando Nasser <fnasser at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: source listing change
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder at cygnus dot com>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 11:18:50 -0700
CC: James Ingham <jingham at cygnus dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, Christopher Blizzard <blizzard at mozilla dot org>
Organization: Cygnus Solutions
References: <38E94593.668AAF44@mozilla.org> <20000403215828.A18519@cygnus.com> <38E94D93.C8A5688C@mozilla.org> <20000403220519.A18799@cygnus.com> <14569.23290.522400.769274@leda.cygnus.com> <38EA21B7.6058@cygnus.com> <38EA2F05.4E5E6B3C@redhat.com>
Reply-To: msnyder at cygnus dot com

Fernando Nasser wrote:
> 
> Michael Snyder wrote:
> >
> > But it would break a lot of GDB testsuites.  Somebody would
> > have to go thru all the new failures and correct the expect code.
> >
> 
> Good point. Patches that cause testsuite regressions are not
> acceptable.  The test fixes are supposed to be integral part of the
> submitted patch.

Of course, we as maintainers might take it on ourselves to 
verify that it causes testsuite regressions.  I was only
speculating (although I'm pretty confident) that it will.

Whose area is this closest to?

References:
- source listing change
  - From: Christopher Blizzard
- Re: source listing change
  - From: Chris Faylor
- Re: source listing change
  - From: Christopher Blizzard
- Re: source listing change
  - From: Chris Faylor
- Re: source listing change
  - From: James Ingham
- Re: source listing change
  - From: Michael Snyder
- Re: source listing change
  - From: Fernando Nasser

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]