This is the mail archive of the
gdb-cvs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
gdb and binutils branch master updated. 666d413cc37ef7f841abf3e8faf2c3cbc7c5b456
- From: qiyao at sourceware dot org
- To: gdb-cvs at sourceware dot org
- Date: 16 Sep 2014 11:18:33 -0000
- Subject: gdb and binutils branch master updated. 666d413cc37ef7f841abf3e8faf2c3cbc7c5b456
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gdb and binutils".
The branch, master has been updated
via 666d413cc37ef7f841abf3e8faf2c3cbc7c5b456 (commit)
from 1c8f6a4d1fcca9e56ac705a224778bf690122a07 (commit)
Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.
- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=666d413cc37ef7f841abf3e8faf2c3cbc7c5b456
commit 666d413cc37ef7f841abf3e8faf2c3cbc7c5b456
Author: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Date: Thu Aug 28 21:27:40 2014 +0800
Another board file for remote host
In the recent review to my patch about copying files to remote host,
we find that we need a board file which is more closely mapped real
remote host testing to improve coverage. With the board file
local-remote-host-native.exp, DejaGNU copies files to
$build/gdb/testsuite/remote-host to emulate the effect of remote host.
Is it OK?
gdb/testsuite:
2014-09-16 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
* boards/local-remote-host-native.exp: New file.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of changes:
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog | 4 +
gdb/testsuite/boards/local-remote-host-native.exp | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/boards/local-remote-host-native.exp
hooks/post-receive
--
gdb and binutils