Hi,
I've just added a frysk.rsl (really simple logger?) package as a
possible alternative to the java logging framework we're currently
using. The "advantages" as I'll spin them are:
-> the logging call is unlocked (at least in the logger level)
so the ongoing saga of older log implementations deadlocking is avoided
-> nested logging works
-> it supports a completer interface
so that << (fhpd) frysk log frysk.proc.<TAB> >> can give a known list
of loggers
-> [I think] the call interface is simpler and lighter
for instance << log.fine(this, "adding foo") >> or << log.fine(this,
"adding foo=", foo); >> (we can add more methods as we need them :-)
thoughts?
Andrew