Re: fhpd vs RuntimeExceptions

[Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon at redhat dot com>]

Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Forgot:
>
> On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 17:01 +0000, Phil Muldoon wrote:
>   
> > Pending a the full implementation of this it's a pain to see every 
> > single exception printed.
> >     
>
> Till there is a difference between fatal and user message "exceptions"
> you can easily get the old behavior by tweaking CLI.flushMessages():
>
> --- a/frysk-core/frysk/hpd/CLI.java
> +++ b/frysk-core/frysk/hpd/CLI.java
> @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ public class CLI {
>                  outWriter.print(prefix);
>              outWriter.println(tempmsg.getMessage());
>             Throwable exc = tempmsg.getException();
> -           if (exc != null)
> +           if (exc != null && false)
>                 exc.printStackTrace(outWriter);
>              iter.remove();
>          }
>
> Or replace false with the heuristic you find acceptable of course.
>   

I'm not advocating any such course. I think we need to let the thread 
move on a bit, have a few more conversations on it, then make a 
decision. It's good to have this conversation, personally, as I learn 
from these debates. I know much more about fhpd now than last week. In 
short, nothing too hasty ;)

Regards

Phil