This is the mail archive of the
frysk@sourceware.org
mailing list for the frysk project.
Re: Debuginfo utilities added
- From: Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon at redhat dot com>
- To: Teresa Thomas <tthomas at redhat dot com>
- Cc: frysk at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:18:17 -0500
- Subject: Re: Debuginfo utilities added
- References: <46AFB0B7.1040806@redhat.com>
Teresa Thomas wrote:
I have just merged my branch with the main branch and committed the
changes. As mentioned earlier, I've added two new related utilities in
frysk/frysk-core/bindir:
1) fdebuginfo <pid(s)> - which lists the debuginfo paths for the
(attached) process' modules. Its output format is a simple list of
module names, followed by their debuginfo paths. Paths for ones that
do not contain debuginfo, are shown as "---".
Awesome, these tools I've been looking forward to for awhile!
Future suggestion:
fdebuginfo <executable> that does the same as <pid> but for a latent,
inanimate executable on disk.
2) fdebugrpm <pid(s)> - which is a bash script that allows you to
install the missing debuginfo packages using yum. This lists the
missing debuginfo packages, and gives the user a choice to install them.
I tried this but got:
[pmuldoon@localhost bindir]$ sudo ./fdebugrpm 2788
Missing Debuginfo package(s)
============================
bash-debuginfo
glibc-debuginfo
ncurses-debuginfo
Do you wish to install the above packages? [y/n]: y
Loading "installonlyn" plugin
Setting up Install Process
Parsing package install arguments
Nothing to do
No debuginfo packages were installed.
I then noticed that in: /etc/yum.repos.d//fedora-updates.repo
The "enabled" flag was = 0. So I set it to 1. That installed the
glibc-debuginfo but not the ncurses and bash debuginfo packages.
I then looked at fedora.repo and the enabled flag was set to 0 there as
well. Set that to 1 and it all worked.
Anyway I mention this, as it seems debuginfo repos are off by default.
If that is so, then some blurb in the man page would be help the user here.
I really like this utility, though. Very useful!
One last item for improvement/discussion. Both fstack and fcore are very
thin wrappers around StrackTraceAction and CoredumpAction classes
respectively. The reason for this is that these classes can then be
called from other utilities, even triggered as part of an observable
action, or via fhpd. Would the same go for extruding classes from
fdebug*, and making the fdebug* executables a thin layer around a
utility class?
Regards
Phil