This is the mail archive of the frysk@sourceware.org mailing list for the frysk project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi Andrew, On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 11:47 -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > I'm looking at ways to more directly test the frysk.testbed.Funit* > classes (e.g., FunitExec, DetachedAckProcess) that wrap > PKGLIBDIR/funit-* utilities, but am finding that the most effective > route is to use frysk.proc's framework - duplicating the existing > frysk.proc tests exercising frysk.proc functionality that is effectively > testing that code. > > I could duplicate the tests but it seems redundant. Any thoughts on a > strategy? I might be missing the exact cases you want to test. But can't you just audit the current frysk.proc tests to see if they cover all relevant cases already and if not add one or two tests to the existing proc tests so all cases are covered? That way you will also extend the real proc tests to handle more cases catching two birds with one stone (if that isn't a terribly political incorrect saying). Cheers, Mark
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |