Re: Automated build-and-test summary report (2007/05/23)

[Andrew Cagney <cagney at redhat dot com>]

Hi Kris,

Is it possible to separate out the building and reporting functions so 
that there's a weekly summary showing trends?  In general, crasher bugs 
are found quickly and directly by running the test-suite locally.  Its 
the more obscure failures, that are missed by normal testing, and 
require drilling down through change/build history that are really 
helped by this system.

Andrew

Kris Van Hees wrote:
> I may be missing something, but I honestly do not understand the issue
> here.  Obviously, an automated build-and-test system that performs
> nightly builds is hardly any use if the results are only emailed out
> once a week.  The continuing existence of tests that show intermittent
> failures, and the continued failure of the dist-builds (that you in fact
> suggested be added to the list of configuration) indicates that we (as
> developers) are not detecting and reporting all problems.  The automated
> system is performing a full-scale test, and extracts the relevant output
> from the tests, consolidating those in clear reports.
>
> However, if receiving a daily report in email places an undue burden on
> you, I can certainly disable the scheduling of nightly builds for Frysk.
> There is no point in running tests when you don't want the results
> distributed to the developers.
>
> 	Cheers,
> 	Kris
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 11:24:35AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>   
> > Kris,
> >
> > Does this really need to be semi-daily?  I thought it was happily 
> > posting weekly summaries.  As developers we can more directly detect and 
> > report immediate problems.
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> >