This is the mail archive of the
frysk@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the frysk project.
Re: Coverage per directory
- From: Kris Van Hees <kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com>
- To: Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Kris Van Hees <kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com>, frysk <frysk at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:13:08 -0700
- Subject: Re: Coverage per directory
- References: <20070425165105.GA6502@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <462F89F5.9040606@redhat.com>
These results are for x86_64 FC6 2.6.20-1.2944.fc6 kernel.
I would love to establish a baseline and collect information across
multiple architectures and kernels, but unfortunately without more
systems being added to the automated build-and-test configuration,
there is a limit to what I can do.
Kris
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:03:49PM -0500, Phil Muldoon wrote:
> Kris Van Hees wrote:
> >As a preliminary result in getting more details on the coverage data,
> >here is a breakdown per directory of executed code lines vs total code
> >lines. I also list the number of source code files found per directory.
> >Note that some files are counted twice because they are compiled twice
> >(once for 32-bit and once for 64-bit).
> >
>
> Because some tests are disabled on some architectures and kernels, it's
> always useful to know where the test results originate from. This will
> alter test coverage (quite a bit in some cases). It would be good to
> establish a baseline (say FC5/x86) and then we could establish testing
> deltas for each kernel/architecture from there. I might have missed it
> in your original email, but I do not know the architecture and kernel
> these tests were run on.
>
> Regards
>
> Phil
>