Re: TestCase.fail() bug

[Nurdin Premji <npremji at redhat dot com>]

Chris Moller wrote:
> I committed a change a while ago that adds
>
> import junit.framework.Assert;
>
> at the top and replaced the TestCase.fail(...)s with Assert.fail(...)s. 
> I'm way too Java-impaired to know if my patch achieves anything like
> your suggestion but, if not, I'll try to hack your stuff in.
>   
Should just be a matter of appending to frysk.junit.TestCase.java:
public static fail(String why) throws AssertionError.
{
super.fail(why)
}
or even:
{
throw new AssertionError(why);
}

I'm unsure of the fail method signature but I think that is correct.
Then we can go back to using TestCase.fail(why) and TestCase in general 
for everything (test related).