Hello, Fryskers, wherever you are!
Per the attached exchange between Andrew and me, does anyone have any
idea how to fix this kind of bug? I'm not a Java guy and haven't a
clue, and the suggestions I got from Phil on IRC regarding similar uses
of TestCase.fail() in frysk weren't similar enough to the uses in
AttachedSelf.java that I could apply them.
Any advice/suggestions/sympathy would be greatly appreciated,
Chris
-------- Original Message --------
Chris,
It's the new more pedantic ECJ; Mark's mentioned this on irc and
frysk@. I'd send it to frysk@ asking for suggestions :-)
Andrew
Hey, Andrew,
The following bug just popped up on some code you added on Friday. It's
coming from a rawhide machine, so I don't know if it's a real bug or a
gcj/ecj gotcha. Anyway, FWIW:
/home/moller/tinkering/frysk/04-16/build/frysk-imports/../../frysk/frysk-imports/frysk/testbed/AttachedSelf.java:66:
error: The static method fail(String) from the type Assert should be
accessed directly
TestCase.fail (why);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
/home/moller/tinkering/frysk/04-16/build/frysk-imports/../../frysk/frysk-imports/frysk/testbed/AttachedSelf.java:77:
error: The static method fail(String) from the type Assert should be
accessed directly
TestCase.fail ("unexpected signal " + sig);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
2 problems (2 errors)
make[3]: *** [frysk/sys/TestPtraceServer.o] Error 1