Re: Re-naming proposals

[Mike Cvet <mcvet at redhat dot com>]

Andrew Cagney wrote:
> There are at least two^w three objects here, the first - is the 
> point-of-contact for the tasks being displayed by the debug window and 
> the second, used by this manager or poc , is the state.  Finally 
> there's a breakpoint object.   I'd be looking to split this class into 
> smaller components, like has been done for Task/TaskState, for instance.
>
> In this context debug is a very overloaded term.  Once the class has 
> been broken down - Run, RunState, ... - a more obvious name will 
> likely become clear.

I don't understand - so the states RunState is using for stepping a task 
should be broken into subclasses?

As far as breakpoints are concerned... that doesn't really matter. The 
original breakpoint class went into RunState because it was used for 
stepping. More general breakpoints for usage by fhpd or the debugging 
window probably should get their own class.

- Mike