This is the mail archive of the
frysk@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the frysk project.
Re: refactoring frysk.proc.*Ptrace* into frysk.proc.ptrace ;; ditto for frysk.proc.core?
- From: Andrew Cagney <cagney at redhat dot com>
- To: Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon at redhat dot com>
- Cc: frysk <frysk at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 12:36:46 -0400
- Subject: Re: refactoring frysk.proc.*Ptrace* into frysk.proc.ptrace ;; ditto for frysk.proc.core?
- References: <4613C748.6040804@redhat.com> <4613C862.1000309@redhat.com>
Phil,
Yes, a separate name space frysk.proc.ptrace for ptrace and
frysk.proc.core for Core. Now that things are clearly cluttered I think
its time for a shuffle :-)
Andrew
Phil Muldoon wrote:
Andrew Cagney wrote:
Just a thought, with a second proc implementation, will this make
life easier?
Not sure what you mean? You mean just rename the classes or create
separate namespaces below proc like:
frysk.proc.ptrace
with classes LinuxPtrace{Host|Proc|Task}{State}.java in there?
and same with:
frysk.proc.core
The seperate namespace thing makes sense to me, as proc is really
getting cluttered.