This is the mail archive of the frysk@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the frysk project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Make TestBreakpoints deterministic


Hi Andrew,

On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 14:30 -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Is it a non-detached terminate event you're seeing?  If a process is a 
> child, rather than a daemon, then there's the potential for two events:
> 
> - the exited status, from the attached process
> 
> - the exited status, because it is a child (the traditional waitpid 
> child stuff)
> 
> could it be that you're seeing?

O, that makes sense. The only strange thing is that we didn't see that
happening on fc5 kernels. But you are right, in this case it is indeed a
real child process so we must wait for the traditional waitpid child
stuff. I have updated the comments in the code to make that clear.

Thanks,

Mark


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]