Re: mailing list re-org

[Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon at redhat dot com>]

I have a vague, but not very strong preference, for a frysk-bugzilla
list and a frysk-cvs list, and frysk discussion/patches list. 

This allows me to write procmail/sieve/* rules that separate the
discussion from the bugzilla entries from the cvs commits by mailing
list name. 

I fear if we track feature updates in bugzilla, and use trackers to
track them, the signal to noise ratio will get too high, and I will miss
important mail. 

My 2cs

Phil


On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 11:11 -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> At present frysk, in addition to the irc channel, has two mailing lists:
> 
> - frysk@ for occasional discussion and announcements (most discussion 
> occurs on gimp.net/frysk)
> - frysk-cvs@ for cvs commits
> 
> Missing from this is a mailing list carrying the bugzilla updates and 
> changes, I can see two ways of integrating this information:
> 
> - frysk@ for all development including bug information and possibly even 
> cvs?; frysk-announce@ for occasional announcements
> 
> - frysk@ as is; frysk-bugzilla@ for bugzilla
> 
> Since tracking the project involves monitoring the discussion, bugs, and 
> cvs changes, I've a vague preference for the former, however?
> 
> thoughts? preferences?
>