This is the mail archive of the frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org mailing list for the frysk project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug general/6570] New: Report lack of a disassembler at run time as UNRESOLVED / UNSUPPORTED


The old lib.opcodes bindings had a way to detect, at runtime, that there wasn't
a disassembler.  The testsuite used that to skip (mark as unsupported)
disassembler tests.  The new bindings lack this (they throw an exception which
could be caught?).

This will let us correctly fix tests such as:

public class TestDisassemblerCommand extends TestLib {
    public void testHpdDisassemble() {
        if (unsupported("disassembler", true))
            return;

to instead be:

    public void testHpdDisassemble() {
        if (missingDisassembler())
            return;

Where frysk.junit.TestCase.missingDisassembler(), modeled on missing32and64(),
would report UNRESOLVED on IA-32 and x86-64 where there should be a
disassembler, but UNSUPPORTED on PPC where the disassembler is simply missing.

-- 
           Summary: Report lack of a disassembler at run time as UNRESOLVED
                    / UNSUPPORTED
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 6541
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6570

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]