This is the mail archive of the
frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org
mailing list for the frysk project.
[Bug general/3910] New: Under 2.6.18-1.3002.el5 ProcBlockAction stalls (forever) with a proc object that has had assertSendStop() called
- From: "pmuldoon at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
- Date: 23 Jan 2007 22:43:46 -0000
- Subject: [Bug general/3910] New: Under 2.6.18-1.3002.el5 ProcBlockAction stalls (forever) with a proc object that has had assertSendStop() called
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
Basically
...
...
// Get a Proc
AckProcess ackProc = new DetachedAckProcess();
ackProc.assertSendStop();
...
...
In a class that extends ProcBlockAction, the constructor is called, but the the
overriden existingTask() method never gets called. It seems hang somewere.
Like
Class Foo extends ProcBlockAction
public Foo(Proc proc)
{
super(proc)
..
// do constructor stuff
..
}
public void existingTask (Task task)
{
...
// This never gets called. No tasks are collected?
}
Apologies at the lack of initial data, just wanted to get the bug filed, and add
data later
--
Summary: Under 2.6.18-1.3002.el5 ProcBlockAction stalls (forever)
with a proc object that has had assertSendStop() called
Product: frysk
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: general
AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
ReportedBy: pmuldoon at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3910
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.