Re: [patch] Add printing of .gdb_index section to readelf

[Frank Ch. Eigler <fche at redhat dot com>]

Hi, Roland -

roland wrote:

> > I'm curious why you think that is a showstopper distinction.  What
> > harm would come from teaching eu-readelf how to pretty-print some
> > "non-interchange" formats, if they are reasonably stable, don't
> > require much eu-readelf uglification?
> 
> There is no reason to think that .gdb_index format is reasonably stable yet.

OK, let's say arguendo .gdb_index undergoes a few versions over the
course of a year.  (One may assume that it's self-identifying.)
Why not pretty-print them all?

- FChE

Attachment: attachment.sig
Description: PGP signature