This is the mail archive of the
ecos-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: [Bug 1000819] Add support for Atmel AT91SAM9263
- From: Grant Edwards <grant dot b dot edwards at gmail dot com>
- To: ecos-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:52:00 +0000 (UTC)
- Subject: Re: [Bug 1000819] Add support for Atmel AT91SAM9263
- References: <bug-1000819-104@http.bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/> <20110518171954.DA7DB2F7800B@mail.ecoscentric.com>
On 2011-05-18, bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org <bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org> wrote:
> Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at:
> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000819
>
> --- Comment #28 from Daniel Helgason <dhelgason@shaw.ca> 2011-05-18 18:19:50 BST ---
> (In reply to comment #11)
>> Let's try to push through with review and get it checked in. I've invited all
>> interested parties to add themselves to the CC list and add their own comment
>> where necessary/appropriate.
>>
>> Evgeniy, the use of multiple patches is a great help - thank you!
>>
>> Let's start with the ARM7/ARM9 abstraction work (patch 1). This looks to be a
>> case of moving the existing HAL cache macros (which are not appropriate for
>> AT91SAM9) from the AT91 variant package to a new ARM7 package. I assume that
>> there is nothing AT91-specific in the new package so it could be used by any
>> other ARM7 ports in the future. Please confirm.
>> ...
>
> Is is correct to have AT91 as a variant? I see it more as a package that
> defines a set of common I/O and provides macros for common AT91 stuff.
That makes a lot of sense to me. In reality, "AT91" is a common set
of peripherals that are used on a variety of Atmel parts having
several different architectures, varieties, and platforms.
> Would it
> make sense if things were arranged more like:
>
> ARM (arch)
> +- ARM7 (variant)
> + SAM7S (platform)
> + SAM7X (platform)
> + Other Non-AT91 chip (platform)
> + SAM7S-EK (board)
> + SAM7X-EK (board)
> ...etc.
> + ARM9 (variant)
> + SAM9263 (platform)
> + SAM9G20 (platform)
> + SAM9RL64 (platform)
> + Other Non-AT91 chip (platform)
> + SAM9G20-EK (board)
> + SAM99RL-EK (board
> ...etc.
> + AT91 (I/O support package)
>
> Or maybe I'm just confused about the relationship between arch, var,
> and plf?
You wouldn't be the first. :)
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Look into my eyes and
at try to forget that you have
gmail.com a Macy's charge card!