Re: bugfix in ethernet driver for the arm at91 variant: if_at91.c

[Sergei Gavrikov <sergei dot gavrikov at gmail dot com>]

Bob Brusa wrote:
> Hi
> This repeats a patch handed in already on 14-Jan-2010. But the epk-file
> then used does not correspond to the desired format. So I switched over to
> a textfile, obtained from a diff (see further down).
> 
> But back to the problem:
> I found a bug in the v3_0 eth-driver if_at91.c. It is in the handling of
> the buffer-to-list copy in routine at91_eth_recv. Actually, it only treats
> the first list and leaves all "higher" ones empty, thereby loosing data in
> packages that exceed the length of a single list.

[snip]

> Sorry, I found that the last my.patch sent included double entries
> and other "nonconformances". This latest version of the attached
> my.patch file is clean now:
> No double entries
> No tabs but spaces
> No cr-lf, lf only

Thanks,

I'll take a look, but, as I said I would wait a while for the Jürgen's
fixes too to know about the possible interception/union boundaries for
the both workarounds.  And I very hope on that you help to provide a
testing on the target then, because, I have not the same hardware.

Sergei
--