This is the mail archive of the ecos-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: at91 cdl refactoring , settable baudrate from redboot


Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 02:01:55PM +0200, Thomas Koeller wrote:

On Monday 08 March 2004 13:17, Thomas Koeller wrote:

Jonathan Larmour wrote:

I'll hold off reverting the relevant parts of the patch (i.e. return bits
back to the platform HALs) straight away so people have a chance to
comment.

Jonathan,


do you think you need much longer to make a decision as to whether this
patch should be reverted or not? As I wrote earlier, I have a couple of
platform HAL packages that would need to be adopted if this change were to
stay, but of course I do not want to do that if things are likely to be
changed back later. But if I dont, I cannot update my repository.

FWIW, I agree with you that most of the cdl options in question should be
in the platfrom HAl for maximum flexibility. The platform HAL packages I am
maintaining are not exactly like one of the evaluation boards. Some of them
have additional I/O channels besides the two serial ports, and they do in
fact use a special startup mode, which is a variant of the ROMRAM mode that
leaves .rodata in rom.

tk

Hi Jani and Jonathan,


I created a patch that undoes Jani's changes that broke all my HAL packages.


OK. Time for action...... Jani, any comments or should i just commit
this patch.

Yes, go ahead.


Jifl
--
eCosCentric    http://www.eCosCentric.com/    The eCos and RedBoot experts
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]