On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 12:40, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
Oh and I think I'd prefer it just use the existing
CYGACC_CALL_IF_FLASH_CFG virtual vector with different option codes. The
reason to use a VV is because we only want a single place to do FLASH
operations. CYGACC_CALL_IF_FLASH_CFG should probably just have been called
CYGACC_CALL_IF_FLASH_OP really - it would always be the same single entity
controlling the flash.
"six of one, half dozen of the other" - I like to keep functionality
separated - FCONFIG access is (in my mind) *very* different than
generic FLASH access and FIS access different still. The fact that
they all distill to FLASH hardware access is incidental and could
even change over time.
Okey dokey. It was just a preference - just seeing if we could avoid using
up a VV (god forbid we have to extend the table size ever!).