Re: lwip license p.s.

[Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>]

Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> [ maintainers list cc'd ]
> Jani Monoses wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 09:25:30 +0100
> > Jonathan Larmour <jifl@eCosCentric.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Just by the way, have a look at the thread about lwip and ppp on 
> > > ecos-maintainers in the archive from 15th april: 
> > > http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-maintainers
> > >
> > > I forgot in the recent mail I sent that ppp requires special treatment.
> >
> >
> > I read those posts back then and now again. What I understand is that ppp
> > too can go in ecos but it would have been better if it did not have 
> > the adv
> > clause.
>
>
> Hmmm, I've just had a look myself at 
> http://savannah.nongnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/lwip/lwip/src/netif/ppp/ I 
> can't see any file with an advertising clause. Andrew, what files were 
> you thinking of when you said about the advertising clause before?

Duh, I was just going to reply to a different (off-list) mail from Jani and 
have just seen the advertising clause further down the file (some of them 
have three copyright headers!). So ignore me, and I'll discuss with Jani 
off-list.

Jifl
--
eCosCentric    http://www.eCosCentric.com/    The eCos and RedBoot experts
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine