This is the mail archive of the
ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: Proposal for processing patches for the eCos 2.0 branch
- From: Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>
- To: Andrew Lunn <andrew dot lunn at ascom dot ch>
- Cc: ecos-maintainers at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 06:00:24 +0100
- Subject: Re: Proposal for processing patches for the eCos 2.0 branch
- References: <200303180848.24682.jld@ecoscentric.com> <1047995318.7459.2925.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org> <200303181605.21189.jld@ecoscentric.com> <20030318185613.GE17373@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch>
Andrew Lunn wrote:
>John Dallaway wrote:
There is still quite a bit of work to be done on the configtool
for 2.0 final so we might consider excepting configtool code from this
process.
Please could you elaborate on the configtool issues.
I used it yesterday for the first time to do the requested testing of
2.0b1. I ran into problems running the test cases. Quite a few times
it did not detect when the test case had finished. I also had gdb
protocol errors with signal4. Running the tests by hand worked
fine. Are these known issues? Do i need to create bugzilla entries?
I don't think I ever saw a reply to this, so if this is still reproducable
with a snapshot from http://www.ecoscentric.com/devzone/configtool.shtml
then bugzilla it.
The testing of AFE1 passed. I used the HAL from 1.5.2 since this is
not in 2.0b1. I then tried to put Redboot in the boot block rather
than using ascom's POST as the boot block and killed the board :-(
This is probably my error in building the image since its not a normal
setup. Time to find a JTAG programmer.
Glad AFE sorta worked, and hope you got it sorted!
Jifl
--
eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine