This is the mail archive of the
ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: [gnu.org #25869] eCos as an FSF project?
- From: Andrew Lunn <andrew dot lunn at ascom dot ch>
- To: Jonathan Larmour <jifl at ecoscentric dot com>
- Cc: ecos-maintainers at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 09:50:51 +0200
- Subject: Re: [gnu.org #25869] eCos as an FSF project?
- References: <rt-25869@gnu.org> <rt-25869-73954.4.22037571649483@rt.gnu.org> <20030410214734.GH1904@gnu.org> <3E95FC5C.9070204@eCosCentric.com>
> I vote to go ahead with Red Hat, but if that fails, drop assignments
> but retain a disclaimer.
Agreed.
> Something else to think about is whether we should plough ahead with
> 2.0 final anyway, or wait till we hear from Red Hat, or at the very
> least wait for some time period for Red Hat. For "just" the
> documentation, they will hopefully be amenable to an accommodation -
> it's not like the FSF are an unknown quantity! Something to consider
> anyway, and it's obvious we can't wait with 2.0 going stale, so I
> suggest a drop dead date, which we wouldn't be real close anyway, as
> there are still some outstanding 2.0 issues.
Make the 2.0 release when its ready independent of what's going on
with FSF, assignment etc.
2.1 can be with the changes for FSF. Hopefully, when releases are
closer together there is much less work involved in making a release.
Andrew