Re: New CPM/DPRAM allocator

[Nick Garnett <nickg at ecoscentric dot com>]

Gary Thomas <gary at mlbassoc dot com> writes:

> On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 08:45, John Dallaway wrote:
> > Nick Garnett wrote:
> > 
> > > > 1) Does this incompatibilty affect _all_ targets which run both RedBoot
> > > > and eCos?
> > >
> > > Just PowerPC QUICC targets, like the MBX, Adder or Viper, for example.
> > 
> > Good. Not as pervasive as I suspected. It looks like Gary is investigating 
> > why the incompatibility is there at all. Hopefully he can resolve the 
> > compatibility issue. I will delay my vote on accepting this into the 2.0 
> > branch pending his report.
> 
> I've just tried this - CVS latest eCos + old (2.0beta) RedBoot
> on the Adder and I can't see a failure.  I tried both the default
> and net templates.
> 
> Nick - any ideas how I can duplicate the failure?
> 

I'm afraid not. I was, until Monday, using the default RedBoot
installed by A&M on the board. Maybe there were other changes since
that was made that make this problem go away.

As explained elsewhere, what I saw was the value at
(CYGHWR_HAL_VSR_TABLE + 0x1F0) was 0xFFFF. This caused
_mpc8xx_allocBd() to reset it to QUICC_BD_BASE and start allocating
network rxbds from there. At some point during that process it
obviously overwrote something being used by redboot's serial device,
which then went haywire.

I don't see how the code as it stands can avoid this. How does the new
eCos know where to allocate BDs to avoid trampling on an old RedBoot's
BDs? Just allocating from the start it seems bound to trample on
something important.

-- 
Nick Garnett                    eCos Kernel Architect
http://www.ecoscentric.com/     The eCos and RedBoot experts