This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: Fwd: eCos arm-eabi GNU tools - test release 4.6.3-20120623
- From: Ilija Kocho <ilijak at siva dot com dot mk>
- To: Alex Schuilenburg <alexs at ecoscentric dot com>
- Cc: John Dallaway <john at dallaway dot org dot uk>, Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>, eCos Discussion <ecos-discuss at ecos dot sourceware dot org>, Sergei Gavrikov <sergei dot gavrikov at gmail dot com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:38:25 +0200
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] Fwd: [ECOS] eCos arm-eabi GNU tools - test release 4.6.3-20120623
- References: <4FE9982C.9020605@dallaway.org.uk> <4FE9A0A5.1080909@siva.com.mk> <50127D75.8060507@ecoscentric.com>
Hi Alex
Thanks for report.
ustl has been upgraded recently
http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001545
so we need to check if that is ustl or compiler or both.
Unfortunately I have no LPC2468, or any target other than Cortex-M handy.
I'm adding Sergei to the CC, I hope he may have some insight.
Thanks
Ilija
On 27.07.2012 13:37, Alex Schuilenburg wrote:
> Hi Ilija,
>
> On 2012-06-26 12:44, Ilija Kocho wrote:
>> Hi Alex
>>
>> As announced by John we have new test release of the GNU tools. This
>> release fixes the issues found in previous test releases in both GCC and
>> GDB so we can continue with testing.
>> Therefore I would ask you to put it on eCosCentric test farm. The
>> details for download and installation are below.
> The 4.6.3-20120623 arm tools are now in the farm running on the stm3210e
> eval board and lpc2468. Actually, I had the lpc2468 start in the farm a
> while ago but failed to monitor the results - they were all timing out
> because the old anoncvs redboot I built in March 2012 is now
> incompatible with the current anoncvs. Obviously RedBoot is now updated.
>
> One big issue is that the ustl permutation fails with every test on the
> lpc2468 for both arm and thumb. The tests fail to start - they either
> dont hit the cyg_test_init breakpoint or they fail with SIGBUS or, if
> they do hit cyg_test_start, they crash and burn afterwards with another
> SIGBUS. I have terminated all ustl tests for the lp2468 as a result as
> they simply slow things down. Unfortunately, excluding the ustl
> failures, the failure rate is currently 13 out of 484 tests run so far.
> I'll post a more complete list when it has run 5000 or more tests.
>
> The stm3210e is faring a lot better. 1113 tests run so far and only 6
> failures: ustl tests that have failed so far are bvt05, bvt13, bvt17 and
> sprintf2. Both testintr and kexcept1 are failing in other perms as before.
>
> -- Alex
>
>
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss