This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: Replacing CVS - decision time: part 2
- From: daniel dot neri at sigicom dot com (Daniel NÃri)
- To: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 11:45:18 +0200
- Subject: [ECOS] Re: Replacing CVS - decision time: part 2
- Connect(): No such file or directory
- References: <4BD83E6A.30002@jifvik.org> <j2t5f2b61004281226k5ccdb34dj4def005f0f58d454@mail.gmail.com> <4BD89330.8030202@ecoscentric.com> <t2v5f2b61004290625ya03b02day97aca9e1c4d050af@mail.gmail.com> <4BD99F2D.8020308@jifvik.org> <h2w5f2b61004300804i7b529373gc5858ca7370833d0@mail.gmail.com>
BjÃrn Forsman <bjorn.forsman@gmail.com> writes:
> I didn't know about that. However, wouldn't it be an accident waiting
> to happen if the SCM system *defaults* to push everything? IMHO git
> seems a bit safer in this respect.
By default hg refuses to push[*] if the result would increase the number
of remote heads. You can override it using the "-f" or "--force" flag,
but a repository can be protected from this using a hook.
Regards,
Daniel
[*] http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/Push
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss