This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: why redboot template of at91sam7sek is wrong?
Hi, Andrew Lunn
Thanks. That solved the problem. The redboot.bin is 113k and the
redboot.elf is 564k. They are too large. I think i should use JTAG
instead.
2009/6/8 Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 05:19:48PM +0800, wb ning wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> i just type the command " ecosconfig new at91sam7sek redboot", but the
>> generated ecos.ecc has 1 conflict. The messages are following:
>> U CYGHWR_HAL_ARM_AT91_FIQ, new inferred value 1
>> U CYGHWR_HAL_ARM_AT91, new inferred value AT91SAM7S
>> U CYGSEM_HAL_ROM_MONITOR, new inferred value 1
>> U CYGIMP_HAL_COMMON_INTERRUPTS_USE_INTERRUPT_STACK, new inferred value 0
>> C CYGPKG_DEVS_SPI_ARM_AT91, "requires" constraint not satisfied: CYGPKG_ERROR
>>
>> so when i want to use "ecosconfig tree", It cannot go.
>> C CYGPKG_DEVS_SPI_ARM_AT91, "requires" constraint not satisfied: CYGPKG_ERROR
>>
>> Unable to generate build tree, this configuration still contains conflicts.
>> Either resolve the conflicts or use --ignore-errors
>>
>> why the template is wrong? Can anyone solve the problem?
>
> In my opinion, it does not make much sense to use redboot on the
> at91sam7s platform. You don't have enough RAM/FLASH. Just use a ROM
> application, and JTAG it straight into FLASH.
>
> If you do want to use redboot try
>
> ecosconfig add error
>
> ? ? ? ? ? ? Andrew
>
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss