This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: "Bad" and "good" GCC FLAGS for ECOS environment
- From: Sergei Gavrikov <sergei dot gavrikov at gmail dot com>
- To: Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>
- Cc: eCos discuss list <ecos-discuss at ecos dot sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:39:42 +0200
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] "Bad" and "good" GCC FLAGS for ECOS environment
- References: <20081113221751.GA11455@ubuntu.local> <491DA41F.4040505@eCosCentric.com>
Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> -mno-short-load-words, -fvtable-gc, and -finit-priority will be removed
> everywhere at the same time as I centralise warning flags.
>
> I'm loathe to change any other flags without being able to test on the
> specific targets in question.
>
> I will mention though that the aeb isn't supported with the new tools as it
> is arm7di. After this amount of time there really didn't seem worth the
> large amount of space having a multilib for it. Everything has multipliers
> now. There's also no separate strongarm multilib any more. I believe this
> just makes things suboptimal, rather than stopping things working. At
> worst, there's the existing tools.
Jonathan, thank you very much for your enlightening comments and now I
know even more than I asked about. I will patient wait for an ajusting
GCC warning flags.
Thank you,
Sergei
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss