This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi Andrew, here's the patch corrected as you suggested and with Changelogs. thanks. Andrea. > > Its just missing ChangeLog entries now... > > > I kept my spurious interrupt detection because I think is more correct and > > quick than the actual one, as explained in my previous mail. > > I thought about this some more. I prefer to keep the check as it > was. eCos will have an array of interrupt handlers. If for some reason > the interrupts control returns a value outside of the handled range of > interrupts, its going to access outside of the bounds of the array to > some psuedo random data to get the address of the interrupt handler > and jump off into oblivion. Such problems are very difficult to find > since they are generally hard to reproduce and have nothing to do with > the flow of code currently running. The check means that it will at > least do something controlled and give the programmer some hope of > finding whats wrong. > > Andrew >
Attachment:
at91_fiq.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |