This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: license
- From: Chris Gray <chris dot gray at kiffer dot be>
- To: pierre <xbouba14 at yahoo dot fr>, ecos-discuss at ecos dot sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 02:28:43 +0200
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] license
- Organization: /k/ Embedded Java Syste;s
- References: <20040707234331.74245.qmail@web50005.mail.yahoo.com>
On Thursday 08 July 2004 01:43, pierre wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to sell a product based on ecos but I
> have been afraid to
> use GPL after reading this article:
>
> What do you think ?
> also do you have already company using ecos ? and
> selling products...
>
> Ps: I found it on a website of a RTOS vendor : green
> hill, I don't want to blaim anyone..
>
> sincerely
> pierre
Well, you could blame GreenHills, as they're the responsible publisher ...
> The thousands of contributors to GPLed RTOSes each own
> the copyright to their contribution. Many contributors
> are identified only by an
> e-mail address.
> vUnder the GPL, the managers of a GPLed project
> disclaim any
> responsibility for collecting valid copyright
> assignments from the contributors.
I don't think this has much to do with the GPL. Some projects insist on rather
formal copyright assignments from their contributors; others don't. Those
that do include anything run by the FSF, and eCos. Those that don't are
living dangerously, bu tprobably account for 99% of the projects on
SourceForge or wherever.
> None the contributors state that their contributions
> do not infringe
> copyrights, trade secrets, or patents. Any contributor
> who hasn't signed
> a valid copyright assignment, or anyone from whom any
> contributor stole
> software, or any contributor's employer who legally
> owns the copyright
> to any work they did on company time or with company
> computers, or the
> holders of patents any contributor inadvertently
> infringed, can sue you
> and all of your customers.
And GreenHills can be certain that none of their software violates any patent
ever issued? If they know how to do that, they should market the service; it
could prove to be far more valuable than just selling operating systems.
> vIf you violate any term of the GPL to even the
> slightest extent, your
> license to distribute the RTOS terminates
> automatically.
On paper, yes; and I expect that GreenHills' contracts contain similar clauses
(mine certainly do). In practice it means that if you are distributing
software in a way which conflicts with the license, you need to (1) change
your behaviour, (2) negotiate the transition, (3) with some sense of urgency.
I don't see a big difference here between eCos and Integrity or WinCE, say.
Illegitimis non carborundum.
--
Chris Gray /k/ Embedded Java Solutions
Embedded & Mobile Java, OSGi http://www.kiffer.be/k/
chris.gray@kiffer.be +32 3 216 0369
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss