Re: [ECOS] Re: AT91 ARM Thumb-mode

[Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>]

Daniel Néri wrote:
> Jonathan Larmour <jifl@eCosCentric.com> writes:
>
>
> > "Only" a test, sure, but it gives us doubts about the compiler's
> > reliability. On the other hand, if anyone reports success using GCC
> > 3.2.2 or GCC 3.2.3 we would very much like to know about it.
>
>
> I just linked my non-thumb application with eCos built as thumb, and
> it seems to have worked. I use a custom HAL, GCC 3.2.3 and binutils
> 2.13.2.1. I've also made a small change to vectors.S, posted to
> ecos-patches a couple of days ago.

Can you confirm if you could build the dhrystone test specifically? Just 
in the default template. If you can also try building it on the pid target 
(but enabling CYGHWR_THUMB) that would be good because internal compiler 
errors can arise by the circumstances being just exactly a certain way, so 
header files from a different platform might make a difference.

Obviously you don't have to run it on PID :).

Jifl
--
eCosCentric    http://www.eCosCentric.com/    The eCos and RedBoot experts
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[  can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln   ]-- Opinions==mine


--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss