This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ecos license question.

From: Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>
To: Peter Vandenabeele <peter dot vandenabeele at mind dot be>
Cc: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 21:42:14 +0000
Subject: Re: [ECOS] ecos license question.
References: <20030115032808.63581.qmail@web14809.mail.yahoo.com> <3E256DF4.502@eCosCentric.com> <20030115192526.Y7140@mind.be>

Peter Vandenabeele wrote:

- you might mention the fact that the specific eCos 2.0 license is considered
  a GPL-compatible, Free SW license, as described on the page on the FSF site
  (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html)

I didn't know we were listed there. They must have been pro-active after our earlier discussions with them. Now noted.

- :s/licence/license/ ?

Oops, we accidentally spelt it correctly in a few places, true. Now correctly broken in the US way ;).

Jifl
--
eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ <info@eCosCentric.com>
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine

--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss

References:
- ecos license question.
  - From: jake smith
- Re: ecos license question.
  - From: Jonathan Larmour
- Re: ecos license question.
  - From: Peter Vandenabeele

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]