This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
RE: Problem with mbufs...
- From: "M.PREM KUMAR" <prem at cdotb dot ernet dot in>
- To: Daniel Lidsten <Daniel dot Lidsten at combitechsystems dot com>
- Cc: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:13:21 +0500 (GMT+0500)
- Subject: RE: [ECOS] Problem with mbufs...
Hi,
Did you find out any bugs/solutions regarding "out of MBUFs" problem.
rgds
prem.
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Daniel Lidsten wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I read your post to eCos mailinglist and wonder if you maybe found some
> bugs in the code that relates to the "out of MBUFs"-problem?
>
> Currently i have the same problem on my MPC823 board. I ping the target
> with large packets "-s 65000" and then the board gives up almost
> immediately. However, it works if i use the default size of the ping
> packets. Seems like the stack has some problem allocating large buffers
> to handle incoming traffic.
>
> Since this is a quite important issue then i suggest that we try to keep
> in touch with our work regarding this problem.
>
> Regards, Daniel
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: M.PREM KUMAR [mailto:prem@cdotb.ernet.in]
> > Sent: den 30 december 2002 16:20
> > To: Gary Thomas
> > Cc: Andrew Lunn; eCos Disuss
> > Subject: [ECOS] Problem with mbufs...
> >
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I updated to latest version of ecos2.0 (16-12-02) taken
> > source from
> > > ecoscentric and ported on our custom board (MPC860 based).
> > > Still we are facing the problems with mbufs especially when we
> > > give flood ping of size 1500 (pkt size).
> > >
> > > eg. ping -f -s 1500 <ip-addr> will immediately start giving
> > > "warning: eth_recv out of mbufs".
>
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss