This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
RE: Possible typo inhal/arm/arm9/var/current/include/hal_cache.h
- From: "Patrick Doyle" <wpd at delcomsys dot com>
- To: "Gary D. Thomas" <gary dot thomas at mind dot be>
- Cc: "Jonathan Larmour" <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>, "eCos Discussion" <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 16:28:56 -0500
- Subject: RE: [ECOS] Possible typo inhal/arm/arm9/var/current/include/hal_cache.h
OK, I'll have a look at that. So far I have avoided running any of the
kernel tests because I have been focusing very intently on getting RedBoot
up and running, and have ignored anything not directly related to RedBoot.
Thus, I will feel comfortable saying at the end of the week that "I have
ported RedBoot to the OMAP", but there is still somme work to be done to
claim that I have ported eCos to the OMAP (most noticably, I have not done
any work at all with interrupts, consequently, I have not done any work at
all with the real time clock, consequently, I have not tried running any of
the "kernel specific" tests).
Anyway, I'll look at it. Perhaps it will run fine even if I don't have
interrupts and the real time clock enabled. Thanks.
--wpd
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary D. Thomas [mailto:gary.thomas@mind.be]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 4:12 PM
> To: Patrick Doyle
> Cc: Jonathan Larmour; eCos Discussion
> Subject: RE: [ECOS] Possible typo
> inhal/arm/arm9/var/current/include/hal_cache.h
>
>
> On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 13:57, Patrick Doyle wrote:
> > > > The board this was written for was never released publically,
> >
> > Watch this space for an announcement real soon about RedBoot
> running just
> > such an OMAP5910 board!
> >
> > > IIRC, Jesper never got the DATA cache working on that platform
> > > anyway - maybe this is why :-)
> >
> > > > So I'm inclined to believe it's wrong, and a patch is welcome :-).
> >
> >
> > > > If you've got the hardware you could play around! At least to verify
> > that
> > > > it's wrong.
> >
> > Hmmm... that opens up a very interesting question, how would I
> "verify that
> > it's wrong"? I'll have to think about a test case on the drive
> home tonight
> > that would verify one cache line size vs. another.
> >
>
> I just added some test code to kernel/tests/kcache2.c which is
> supposed to be able to check this sort of thing. You have to
> enable it [by hand], but it might be useful.
>
> > > Indeed, and then please share the results!
> > But, of course!
> >
> > --wpd
> --
> .--------------------------------------------------------.
> | Mind: Embedded Linux and eCos Development |
> |--------------------------------------------------------|
> | Gary Thomas email: gary.thomas@mind.be |
> | Mind ( http://mind.be ) tel: +1 (970) 229-1963 |
> | gpg: http://www.chez-thomas.org/gary/gpg_key.asc |
> '--------------------------------------------------------'
>
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss