This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: _flash_xxx() in flash_am29xxxxx.inl
On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 20:25, Motoya Kurotsu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > The routines
> > you want to patch don't actually touch the FLASH space (except via
> > the call to the _XXX routine that does the work), so they can reside
> > anywhere.
>
> I think _XXX routine actually touches the FLASH space
> and it is the very one which I want to patch.
> I suspect that you might mistake XXX for _XXX.
> In my opinion,
>
> 1) XXX can be anywhere.
> 2) _XXX and should be in ram.
>
> Correct?
Yes, I think so. It looks like we've just been lucky in the past
with these routines working as they are. I'll apply your patch.
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss