This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: ICE only for download
- From: Roland Caßebohm <roland dot cassebohm at visionsystems dot de>
- To: "eCos Discussion" <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Cc: "Siegfried Schaefer" <s dot schaefer at schaefer-edv dot de>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 15:45:00 +0200
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] ICE only for download
- References: <3D170B27.8040901@techtribe.se> <200206241511.g5OFB6O27320@hhlx01.visionsystems.de> <000a01c21c16$12f7c080$1746a8c0@mars>
On Tuesday, 25. June 2002 09:01, Siegfried Schaefer wrote:
> Hello,
> i have purchased a wiggler and tried to work with it with our own ATMEL and
> SAMSUNG based arm7tdmi plattforms. I have tried the wiggler under Win98 /
> W2000 / XP and for me it is not a low cost alternative for the Jeeni i
> owned, too. The wiggler is not nearly as stable as the Jeeni (with the same
> gdb). For example i could always connect to the samsung based platforms
> with the Jeeni, but only 1 of ten !! with the wiggler. Debugging was not
> stable (the target "hangs" often after stepping through the code). Atmel
> based platforms behave a little better, but just a little. Has someone
> better experiences with the wiggler (or any other low cost jtag interface)
> ?
>
> With best regards, Siegfried Schaefer
> Schaefer EDV-Dienstleistungen und Softwareentwicklungen
Till now I don't use any JTAG interface and gdb over ethernet hangs sometime
too. But in the main I will use the JTAG interface to download an image
because this is the only option to do that without having a working bootstrap
in FLASH. But I think for having this feature is 2500 US$ to much.
Do you think the wiggler could be enough for my intention?
Roland
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss