This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: Does the fixed_vector section have anything to do with the virtual vector table?
- From: Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour at redhat dot com>
- To: HuangQiang <jameshq at liverpool dot ac dot uk>
- Cc: eCos <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 22:23:52 +0100
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] Does the fixed_vector section have anything to do with the virtual vector table?
- Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd.
- References: <KIEBICHBADHFCLGCKOPDGEPFCLAA.jameshq@liv.ac.uk>
HuangQiang wrote:
>
> Hi all:
> Question as subject. Thank you for your reply.
Not at all. Virtual vectors are "soft" vectors - purely there for things
that software requires. They're nothing to do with hardware devices. That's
why, for example, the virtual vector table layout is the same for every
ecos target.
Jifl
--
Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss