This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
RE: redboot memory map.
- From: max <maxrtos at yahoo dot com>
- To: jlarmour at redhat dot com, ecos <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 20:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: RE: [ECOS] redboot memory map.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jlarmour@cambridge.redhat.com
> [mailto:jlarmour@cambridge.redhat.com]On Behalf Of
Jonathan Larmour
> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 12:06 PM
> To: Max
> Cc: ecos
> Subject: Re: [ECOS] redboot memory map.
>
>
> Max wrote:
> >
> > target PC 386.
> > redboot image: got binary file from redboot site.
> >
> > I just notice something from the redboot bootup
message.
> > "
> > RedBoot(tm) bootstrap and debug environment -
built 05:37:52,
> Jun 8 2001
> > Platform: PC (I386)
> > Copyright (C) 2000, 2001, Red Hat, Inc.
> > RAM: 0x00000000-0x000a0000, 0x0007c080-0x000a0000
available
> > "
> > Q1: look available RAM range, it can not be right?
Overlapped.
> > Where can I find related code?
> > Besides the Redboot Manual says that Redboot will
use 2000 ro a0000, and
> > a000 to
> > 100000 is reserved for ROM and BIOS. Tha
application should be
> load from
> > 0x100000 upwards.
>
> Yes, we know about this problem. What RedBoot prints
for the RAM area is
> misleading. The documentation is correct.
Any one there familair with this part of code?
>
> Jifl
> --
> Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK.
Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
> Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous
Huxley ||
> Opinions==mine
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss