This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: c++ ecos performance
Grant Edwards wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 09:29:01AM -0600, Rosimildo da Silva wrote:
> > I dare to ask: what is "unsafe" in C++ that is not in C ?
>
> Nothing. C is also unsafe. But, C is far simpler, so it's
> easier to avoid the pitfalls.
Using this line of reasoning, it would be far safer to have
only a hammer in ones toolbox (perhaps only a rubber hammer).
Perhaps we could even get some government regulations to
protect us from our selves.
Oops ... I did it again,
mike
--
Michael N. Moran
5009 Old Field Ct.
Kennesaw, GA 30144
(h) 770 516 7918
(c) 678 521 5460
The Beatles were wrong: 1 & 1 & 1 is 1
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss