This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: System timer resolution and TCP/IP package
- From: Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour at redhat dot com>
- To: Andrew Lunn <andrew dot lunn at ascom dot ch>
- Cc: Grant Edwards <grante at visi dot com>,Jurica Baricevic <jura at intesis dot hr>,Ecos <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 18:40:52 +0000
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] System timer resolution and TCP/IP package
- Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd.
- References: <20020125141707.A15335@visi.com> <NFBBJGOLDDDGJPLCMJKNMEGGCDAA.jura@intesis.hr> <20020212122625.A22150@visi.com> <3C695EAB.512B760E@redhat.com> <20020212193511.A26919@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch>
Andrew Lunn wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 06:27:55PM +0000, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> > But the effect is that there will be two(!) net stacks in eCos, and many of
> > the files have moved around, so some care with patches will be required.
> > It's maybe a patch to hold on to until after 2.0.
>
> Two different stacks or two OpenBSD stacks but of different ages?
The existing one is OpenBSD, and the new one is FreeBSD. Obviously similar
due to the lineage, but not a one-for-one swap per se. It should also be
easier for us to keep it up to date with newer versions of the stack in the
future.
Jifl
--
Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss