This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
RE: RAM FileSystem memory usage
- To: "'Jonathan Larmour'" <jlarmour at redhat dot com>,"'Trenton D. Adams'" <tadams at extremeeng dot com>
- Subject: RE: [ECOS] RAM FileSystem memory usage
- From: "Trenton D. Adams" <trent dot nospam at telusplanet dot net>
- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 22:24:21 -0600
- Cc: "'eCos Discussion'" <ecos-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
You're right, that was pretty vague!
What I'm wondering is this. What's the overhead of the driver asside
from file allocation, blocks, etc. If there's not a finite answer to
this I'll just have to test it I guess.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com
> [mailto:ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com] On Behalf Of
> Jonathan Larmour
> Sent: August 1, 2001 9:05 PM
> To: Trenton D. Adams
> Cc: 'eCos Discussion'
> Subject: Re: [ECOS] RAM FileSystem memory usage
>
>
> "Trenton D. Adams" wrote:
> >
> > What's the overhead for the RAM filesystem driver?
>
> That's quite vague. Static overhead? Overhead per file? per
> block? And in what configuration?
>
> It's probably best to try it and see IMHO :-).
>
> Jifl
> --
> Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44
> (1223) 271062 Maybe this world is another planet's Hell
> -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine
>