Re: [ECOS] Anyone else working with HP PA-RISC?

["Lewin A.R.W. Edwards" <larwe at larwe dot com>]

Hi Jonathan,

> > Originally I had no problems building binutils 2.10.1 for hppa-elf under
> > cygwin 1.1.8. However, it now dies with a missing header file. Current
> > snapshots of gcc also say that the configuration hppa-elf is no longer
> > supported. I don't remember what version I had to go back to to get this
>
>You could try 2.11, or mail binutils@sources.redhat.com. But you'll have to
>give the exact failure, i.e. which missing header.

Well, I'm getting there. 2.9 builds OK as hppa-elf. That's pretty weird, 
on-again off-again support for the target. I'm trying some gcc builds right 
now.

>As for the hppa-elf target, I don't know for sure, but hppa-lites might be
>what you want. Maybe. Or ask on the gcc lists.

Purely for my curiosity: Has there ever been any consideration mentioned by 
anyone for a PA-RISC port?


-- Lewin A.R.W. Edwards
Embedded Engineer, Digi-Frame Inc.
Work: http://www.digi-frame.com/
Tel (914) 937-4090 9am-6:30pm M-F ET
Personal: http://www.larwe.com/ http://www.zws.com/

"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even 
though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who 
neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray 
twighlight that knows not victory nor defeat."
(Theodore Roosevelt)