This is the mail archive of the ecos-devel@sourceware.org mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: NAND technical review

From: Jonathan Larmour <jifl at jifvik dot org>
To: Jürgen Lambrecht <J dot Lambrecht at televic dot com>
Cc: eCos developers <ecos-devel at ecos dot sourceware dot org>, Deroo Stijn <S dot Deroo at TELEVIC dot com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:55:29 +0100
Subject: Re: NAND technical review
References: <4ACB4B58.2040804@ecoscentric.com> <4ACC61F0.3020303@televic.com> <4AD3E92E.5020301@jifvik.org> <4AD41FA6.2020600@televic.com>

Jürgen Lambrecht wrote:

Jonathan Larmour wrote:
Jürgen Lambrecht wrote:

[snip]

We have it very well tested, amongst others

[snip]

That's extremely useful to know, thanks! But a couple of further questions on this: (1) Did any bad blocks show up at any point? (2) Were you using a bad block table? (3) Presumably there were factory-marked bad blocks on some?
(3) Yes, there are almost always factory-marked bad blocks. (2) yes (1)Yes, certainly! We have from time to time bad blocks, and they are handled correctly.

That's great to know, especially (1), thanks!

Jifl
--
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine

References:
- Re: NAND technical review
  - From: Ross Younger
- Re: Re: NAND technical review
  - From: Jürgen Lambrecht
- Re: NAND technical review
  - From: Jonathan Larmour
- Re: NAND technical review
  - From: Jürgen Lambrecht

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]